Teams postpone fixes because the environment already feels fragile, which leaves oversized instances and legacy resources untouched for another quarter.
Old instances, snapshots, and forgotten services raise the bill and quietly expand the attack surface at the same time.
Cost pain often traces back to network design, load balancing, storage classes, or database sizing decisions that never got revisited after launch.
Dashboards can highlight anomalies, but teams still need someone to map the issue to the AWS resources, dependencies, and safe remediation path.
A surprising number of cost assessments end with a spreadsheet and no engineering follow-through. The gap is usually not visibility. It's turning spend signals into safe infrastructure changes.
We optimize for durable savings without introducing new instability, which means the review stays focused on architecture-aware remediation your team can safely apply.
We are certified AWS architects who understand the technical nuances of your infrastructure. We optimize for cost without breaking production.
We provide clear, actionable steps with implementation instructions, command-line instructions, and configuration templates your team can execute immediately.
We target high-impact, architectural optimizations that tools miss. Our clients consistently see double-digit reductions in 30 days.
This account had grown for years without a cleanup cycle. The review surfaced the biggest cost drivers, mapped them back to the architecture, and showed exactly where remediation would move the run rate.
The largest savings came from architecture simplification, rightsizing, and cleanup of infrastructure that had stayed live well past its useful life.
Consolidated to 1 ALB with host-based routing. Eliminated 95% of ELB costs.
Right-sized 9 EC2 instances and 3 RDS databases to match actual workload demand.
Migrated all volumes to gp3. Improved IOPS by 20% and reduced storage cost by 20%.
Implemented lifecycle policies and purged snapshots older than 30 days.
Fig 1.1: Service breakdown. Note the 67% reduction in EC2 and RDS costs (blue/purple segments) post-optimization.
Month-over-month
Projected run rate
Uptime maintained
The value was not the chart alone. The value was a prioritized remediation list that tied each spike in spend back to specific AWS resources and a safe implementation path.
Consolidated to 1 ALB with host-based routing. Eliminated 95% of ELB costs.
Right-sized 9 EC2 instances and 3 RDS databases to match actual workload demand.
Migrated all volumes to gp3. Improved IOPS by 20% and reduced storage cost by 20%.
Implemented lifecycle policies and purged snapshots older than 30 days.
The goal is to move from bill anxiety to a sequence of changes your team can actually ship. We map the spend, explain the trade-offs, and leave you with a plan that can survive engineering scrutiny.
We start with the business context behind the bill, then collect secure read-only access so the review begins from your actual account topology instead of assumptions.
We inventory the account, trace the largest cost drivers, and connect them to the services, environments, and dependencies that need to be considered before a change ships.
You receive a review that ranks recommendations by savings potential, operational risk, and implementation effort, plus the practical instructions needed to execute them.
Use the roadmap, CLI guidance, and architecture notes as the working plan for internal remediation.
We can help execute the changes, validate the rollout, and stay involved where larger architecture changes need careful sequencing.
Purchase the engagement through AWS Marketplace when procurement or billing needs to stay inside your AWS vendor workflow.
They can. The question is whether it stays a priority. Cost work competes with the product roadmap, and the patterns that move the needle (right-sizing, commitment laddering, idle detection at scale, networking and data-transfer audits) take a few weeks to build muscle in. We deliver the cleanup once, hand over the playbook your team can re-run quarterly, and most clients see savings the same month rather than waiting six months for an internal project to land.
Rare, but it happens. Even on well-managed accounts we typically find 15 to 30 percent of waste in idle resources, oversized instances, unused EBS snapshots, NAT Gateway traffic, or commitment coverage gaps. On the success-based engagement model you only pay when verified savings show up, so the downside risk sits with us. On the fixed-price assessment you still walk away with a documented baseline and a FinOps process your team can run going forward.
FinOps tools surface data. They tell you what your accounts look like. They do not decide what is safe to change, write the CDK or Terraform to change it, or sequence the rollout so production keeps working. Our review uses the same data sources, then adds the engineering layer: a prioritized fix list, infrastructure code where it helps, and a remediation order that respects your dependencies. Tools and reviews are complementary, not substitutes.
We'll review the shape of your bill, the infrastructure behind it, and whether a focused cost optimization engagement is the right next step for your team.
Need a broader architecture review first? Our AWS Well-Architected Framework Review covers cost alongside security, reliability, and operational excellence. You can also explore our other AWS Professional Services.