Available in

Find the AWS risks that actually deserve engineering time.

We manually validate the findings that matter, remove the noise your team will never action, and package the review into a report your engineers can use without translating scanner output into real work.
Request a Security ReviewSee Report Preview
5/5 from 16 reviews onGoogle ReviewsGoogle Logo
AWS Security Review
us-east-1
Security standardsAssessment Report
Security Score

Last scanned: 10 mins ago

3
Critical
12
High
Top Findings
S3 Bucket Public Access
s3-bucket-policy
# Block public access
aws s3api put-public-access-block \
--bucket prod-assets \
--public-access-block-configuration ...
Root Account MFA Missing
EBS Volume Unencrypted
AWS Resources Scanned
1,240+
48h
Target turnaround for the initial report once access is in place
200+
Security controls reviewed across IAM, networking, storage, and logging
Where security reviews break down

Most AWS security reviews fail at the handoff to engineering.

Teams do not need more scanner volume. They need a review that explains what is real, what is urgent, and what the remediation path looks like inside their current AWS architecture.

What changes after the review

The outcome is a report your team can turn into a backlog, not a document that creates another layer of triage work before real remediation begins.

Typical deliverable

Generic findings and compliance language that still leave your engineers with the hard translation work.

What your team needs

A security review that narrows the report to the issues worth fixing and explains how to fix them.

Typical deliverable

Signal vs. noise

Scanner exports with dozens of low-context findings, weak prioritization, and no clear ownership handoff.

What your team needs

Signal vs. noise

Manual validation that narrows the report to the findings your engineers should actually spend time fixing.

Typical deliverable

Context vs. checklists

Generic 'best practices' language that ignores why the current AWS architecture exists or what constraints it serves.

What your team needs

Context vs. checklists

Architecture-aware commentary that explains the business and operational trade-offs behind each recommendation.

Typical deliverable

Solutions vs. homework

A PDF that tells the team something is wrong but leaves them to figure out the remediation path on their own.

What your team needs

Solutions vs. homework

Console steps, CLI guidance, and prioritization that make the report usable inside a real engineering backlog.

Report preview

A report structure that helps teams fix issues instead of triaging PDFs.

The deliverable is designed for engineering use. It starts with the highest-risk issues, shows the validated technical detail behind them, and gives teams a remediation path they can work from immediately.

Why teams act on it

Every section is there to reduce decision friction: what matters first, what is real in this account, and how to fix it without another round of interpretation.

Security Scorecard
Score: B+
3
Critical Risks
12
High Priority
Top Business Risks
Public S3 Bucket Access
Root Account MFA Missing

Executive Summary

The Insight
Consolidated Vulnerability Report

Get a complete overview of your security posture. We consolidate all identified vulnerabilities into a single, easy-to-read report, giving you a clear picture of exactly where your risks lie without the noise.

How the review runs

The Security Review Roadmap

The engagement is structured to move quickly from access to validated findings. The goal is not a generic audit artifact. It is a report your team can use to reduce real risk with less interpretation work.

Step 1

Context and access

We start with the environment context, current pain points, and the control boundaries you care about before requesting temporary read-only access.

Access setupArchitecture context capturedKnown concerns logged
Step 2

Deep validation against controls

We inspect IAM, networking, storage, logging, and adjacent services against 200+ controls, including AWS Foundational Best Practices, then validate which findings are materially risky in your environment.

Validated findingsArchitecture-aware notesFalse positives filtered out
Step 3

Report and remediation path

You receive a report structured for engineering use, with prioritized risks, supporting evidence, and remediation instructions your team can act on immediately.

Security reportCLI and console guidancePrioritized roadmapExecutive summary

Remediate with your team

Use the report as the backlog input and work through the findings internally with clear remediation steps in hand.

  • Validated findings only
  • CLI and console guidance
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap
Start with the review

Bring us in for fixes

We can help implement the remediation plan, sequence higher-risk changes, and validate the environment after the work lands.

  • Hands-on remediation
  • Change sequencing support
  • Post-fix validation
Request remediation help

Get the AWS Security Review through AWS Marketplace

Purchase the engagement through AWS Marketplace when procurement or billing needs to stay inside your AWS vendor workflow.

Buy on
Security review FAQ

Questions teams ask
before granting access

What is included in the AWS Security Review Report?
Our Security Review Report provides a detailed breakdown of every security finding:
  • Finding Details: A clear explanation of the issue and its potential impact on your environment.
  • Affected Resources: A specific list of resources (e.g., Security Groups, S3 Buckets including ARNs) impacted by the finding.
  • Recommendation & Source: Step-by-step remediation instructions, including CLI commands and links to official AWS documentation for further reading.
This structured approach ensures you have a complete overview of each risk and the exact steps needed to fix it.
How is this different from relying on automated security tools?

Automated tools surface signals; we add context. We validate the findings, remove false positives, and deliver remediation guidance tailored to your workloads. We benchmark against the CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark, AWS Foundational Security Best Practices, the AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, and relevant compliance frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

How do you keep temporary access to our AWS account secure?

We use time-limited IAM roles with only the permissions required for the assessment. All activity is logged in your CloudTrail, and we remove access as soon as the review concludes. No long-lived credentials are ever created.

What if there are hundreds of findings? Will the report be overwhelming?

Findings are grouped by severity, service, and remediation pattern. For widespread issues we highlight bulk fixes, and every recommendation includes step-by-step console guidance plus copy-ready CLI commands so your team can act quickly.

What happens after the review, and can you help implement fixes?

We deliver the report, walk you through it in a 30-minute session, and then you choose the path forward: handle remediation internally, request a quote for us to assist, or schedule a follow-up validation review at a reduced rate. Implementation support is optional but available when you need it.

Book the review

Ready to review the parts of AWS that scanners keep flattening?

We'll talk through the current security posture, the architecture behind it, and whether a focused AWS security review is the right first step before broader remediation work.

Read-only access patternPrioritized remediation reportOptional hands-on fixes

Need a broader architecture lens as well? Our AWS Well-Architected Framework Review covers security alongside reliability, cost, and operational excellence. You can also explore our other AWS Professional Services.