Find the AWS risks that actually deserve engineering time.
Last scanned: 10 mins ago
Last scanned: 10 mins ago
Teams do not need more scanner volume. They need a review that explains what is real, what is urgent, and what the remediation path looks like inside their current AWS architecture.
The outcome is a report your team can turn into a backlog, not a document that creates another layer of triage work before real remediation begins.
Generic findings and compliance language that still leave your engineers with the hard translation work.
A security review that narrows the report to the issues worth fixing and explains how to fix them.
Hundreds of low-context findings, weak prioritization, and no clear ownership handoff.
A short list of the findings your engineers should actually spend time fixing, validated against the real environment.
Checklist language that ignores why the current AWS architecture exists or what constraints it serves.
Recommendations that account for your business constraints and explain the operational trade-offs behind each one.
A PDF that flags problems but leaves the team to figure out the remediation path on their own.
Console steps, CLI commands, and prioritization that drop straight into your engineering backlog.
Built for engineering use. Starts with the highest-risk issues, shows the validated technical detail, and ends with a remediation path your team can execute the same day.
Every section answers a question the team would have asked anyway: what matters first, what is real in this account, and how to fix it without another round of interpretation.
One scorecard with every validated finding, ranked by severity and business impact. No scrolling through scanner exports to figure out where to start.
The engagement is structured to move quickly from access to validated findings. The goal is not a generic audit artifact. It is a report your team can use to reduce real risk with less interpretation work.
We start with the environment context, current pain points, and the control boundaries you care about before requesting temporary read-only access.
We inspect IAM, networking, storage, logging, and adjacent services against 200+ controls, including AWS Foundational Best Practices, then validate which findings are materially risky in your environment.
You receive a report structured for engineering use, with prioritized risks, supporting evidence, and remediation instructions your team can act on immediately.
Use the report as the backlog input and work through the findings internally with clear remediation steps in hand.
We can help implement the remediation plan, sequence higher-risk changes, and validate the environment after the work lands.
Purchase the engagement through AWS Marketplace when procurement or billing needs to stay inside your AWS vendor workflow.
We'll talk through the current security posture, the architecture behind it, and whether a focused AWS security review is the right first step before broader remediation work.
Need a broader architecture lens as well? Our AWS Well-Architected Framework Review covers security alongside reliability, cost, and operational excellence. You can also explore our other AWS Professional Services.