A Well-Architected review that ends in a roadmap you ship.

For B2B SaaS startups and scaleups. We review the workload across all six Well-Architected pillars and deliver a prioritized remediation roadmap with concrete implementation guidance, not a questionnaire export.

Free 30-minute intro call, no commitment. You get a fixed price before any paid work starts. Your team's time: a discovery call and a walkthrough of the report; we do the rest.

From $495
Fixed scope and fixed price, agreed in the free intro call
6 pillars
Reviewed together against the running workload, in 1 to 2 weeks
Search
production-saasInfo
Generate reportContinue reviewing
OverviewMilestonesProperties
Workload overview
Questions answered
57/57
High risk issues
9
Medium risk issues
14
Risks by pillar
High riskMedium risk
PillarQuestions answeredHighMedium
Operational excellence
11/1113
Security
11/1133
Reliability
13/1334
Performance efficiency
5/501
Cost optimization
11/1122
Sustainability
6/601
Prioritized improvement plan (23)
REL 9 How do you back up data?High risk
SEC 2 How do you manage authentication for people and machines?High risk
COST 6 How do you meet cost targets when you select resource type, size and number?Medium risk

Sample workload, reviewed against the real Well-Architected pillars.

Why generic reviews stall

The questionnaire got answered. Nothing shipped.

Most teams have been through a Well-Architected review before: a self-assessment in the AWS WA Tool, or a session with an AWS solutions architect. Both turn answers to questions into a list of risks. Neither looks at the running workload or tells engineering what to change first.

  1. 01
    Risks from questionnaire answers
    Every finding checked against the running workload.
  2. 02
    Six pillars, one flat list
    A roadmap ranked by business impact, so the gaps that could take production down come first.
  3. 03
    A report that stalls after the meeting
    Owners, effort and implementation guidance for each fix, or the fixes shipped as pull requests.
Compare review options

Not every Well-Architected review ends in shipped work.

The AWS tool generates a questionnaire. Generic consultants generate a report. The gap is what happens next: prioritization, architecture context and implementation detail your team can actually use.

A senior, AWS-certified engineer

The review is grounded in production AWS delivery work, so the recommendations are shaped by real operating constraints instead of generic framework language.

All six pillars, reviewed together

Security, reliability, performance, cost, operational excellence, and sustainability are assessed as one workload system rather than six disconnected checklists.

Action-ready remediation output

Findings can include CLI commands, console steps, and infrastructure-as-code guidance so the report becomes useful implementation input immediately.

Depth of analysis

  • Resource-level inspection
    Comprehensive
  • Architecture context
    Expert

Deliverables

  • IaC remediation snippets
    Included
  • CLI commands and console steps
    Included

Actionable outcome

  • Prioritized roadmap
    Included
  • Implementation effort required from your team
    Lower

Pillar coverage

  • All six pillars covered together
    Full

Implementation support

  • Post-review remediation help
    Included
Compare the reviews

Which review do I need?

See all AWS services
  • AWS Well-Architected Review

    Pick it when you want the whole workload reviewed across all six pillars, against what actually runs.

    You are on this page

  • AWS Security Review

    Pick it when security is the only worry, or an audit is coming up.

    See the AWS Security Review
  • AWS Cost Optimization

    Pick it when the bill is the problem, not the architecture as a whole.

    See the AWS Cost Optimization
  • AWS CDK Review

    Pick it when the pain is in the CDK code and how it is structured, not the running workload.

    See the AWS CDK Review
  • AWS CDK Landing Zone

    Pick it when the accounts and guardrails underneath need rebuilding.

    See the AWS CDK Landing Zone
Report preview

From findings to a concrete improvement plan.

The report moves from visibility to action. Each layer gives your team the context to decide what to fix first and the detail to start executing without another discovery cycle.

Why teams act on it

Each section is built to reduce decision friction: what matters first, what is real in this workload, and how to sequence the remediation into shippable work.

Sample report: a made-up workload, reviewed against the real Well-Architected pillars.

Pillar assessment

The overview
Six-pillar visibility without flattening the workload

The opening layer shows where the architecture is strongest, where the larger gaps sit, and how those findings distribute across the Well-Architected pillars.

After the report

Then we fix it, as pull requests to your repo.

The report tells you which risks to fix first. Your team can work through them, or we ship the fixes: infrastructure as code in your own repository, reviewed and merged like any other change.

  • A fixed quote for the fixes before any work starts
  • Every change lands as a pull request your team reviews
  • The code stays in your repository, so nothing is locked in
From a client
โ€œDanny expertly evaluated my existing stack and completely redesigned it following AWS best practices.โ€
Rene Molenaar
Founder, NetworkLessons
Read the reviews on GoogleRead the NetworkLessons case study
How the review runs

Three steps from access to a roadmap your team can use

The engagement is structured to move from workload context to a remediation plan engineering can actually use. The goal is a better next change sequence, not a checklist artifact that stalls after delivery.

  1. Discovery call

    Context and temporary access

    We start with the workload, the pressure behind it and the concerns you already have, then set up temporary read-only access.

    • Scope confirmed
    • Read-only access in place
    • Known concerns logged
  2. Analysis

    Six-pillar workload analysis

    We review the workload across all six Well-Architected pillars, checking findings against the actual resource configuration instead of questionnaire answers alone.

    • Pillar-by-pillar findings
    • Architecture-aware notes
    • Validated risk picture
  3. Walkthrough

    Report and remediation roadmap

    We walk your team through the report: prioritized recommendations, implementation guidance and a phased roadmap from quick wins to larger changes.

    • Well-Architected report
    • Remediation guidance
    • Phased roadmap
    • Executive summary
Well-Architected Reviews start from
$495

We review the running workload across all six pillars, not a questionnaire, and walk your team through the risks in a session. You leave with a roadmap ordered by impact: ship it yourselves, or have us ship the fixes as pull requests for a fixed quote. More workloads mean more to review, so $495 is where it starts.

Buy it through AWS Marketplace to keep procurement and billing inside your AWS account.

Well-Architected Review FAQ

What teams ask
before booking a review

What does the Well-Architected Review cost?

Well-Architected Reviews start from $495. The final fixed price depends on the workload size, the complexity of the architecture, and how many environments are in scope. We confirm the scope and the price during the free intro call before any paid work starts. No commitment required. See how assessment pricing works.

Do you need access to our AWS accounts?

Yes, we require temporary read-only access to perform the review. We provide a CloudFormation template that creates a time-limited IAM role with only the permissions needed for the assessment. All activity is logged in your CloudTrail, and access is removed as soon as the review concludes.

Why pay you when AWS Solutions Architects can run a Well-Architected review for free?

AWS Solutions Architects can run the official questionnaire-based review under Enterprise Support, and that is a useful starting point. Where our review is different: we inspect the actual resource configuration rather than relying on self-reported answers, deliver console steps and IaC snippets for each finding, and sequence the remediation into a phased roadmap your team can execute. The AWS review surfaces gaps; ours turns them into shipped work.

How is this different from the AWS Well-Architected Tool?

The AWS Well-Architected Tool is a self-service questionnaire that relies on your team's own answers. Our review goes deeper: we analyze your actual resource configurations, IAM policies, networking setup, and operational practices. We validate findings against real-world best practices, remove false positives, and deliver prioritized recommendations with implementation guidance your team can act on immediately.

How long does the review take?

A typical Well-Architected Framework Review takes 1-2 weeks depending on the size and complexity of your environment. This includes the initial discovery call, the deep-dive analysis across all six pillars, and the delivery of the comprehensive report with a findings walkthrough session.

What is included in the Well-Architected Framework Review report?
Our Well-Architected report provides a comprehensive assessment across all six pillars:
  • Pillar-by-Pillar Findings: Detailed analysis of your workloads against Operational Excellence, Security, Reliability, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability.
  • Risk Prioritization: Findings ranked by business impact and severity so you know exactly where to focus first.
  • Remediation Roadmap: A phased improvement plan with step-by-step instructions, IaC snippets, and AWS Console guidance for each finding.
This structured approach ensures you have a clear understanding of your architectural risks and a concrete plan to address them.
Which Well-Architected Framework pillars do you review?

We review all six pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework: Operational Excellence, Security, Reliability, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability. Each pillar is assessed individually with findings and recommendations specific to your workloads and business context.

Can you review multiple workloads or just one?

Both. A single-workload review is the most common starting point because it keeps the engagement tight and actionable. If you have multiple workloads, we scope them individually so each gets the right depth, then stagger delivery so your team is not absorbing every report at once. We discuss scope on the free intro call.

Can we share the report with auditors, customers, or investors?

Yes. The report is yours to use. Clients commonly share it during SOC 2 audits, with enterprise customers asking for architecture documentation, and with investors during due diligence. Each finding references the relevant Well-Architected pillar and, where applicable, the underlying compliance control so the evidence is recognizable to any auditor.

What happens after the review?

We deliver the report and walk you through the findings in a dedicated session. From there, you choose your path: implement the improvements yourself using our detailed guides and IaC snippets, or engage us to handle the remediation. We also offer follow-up reviews to validate improvements and track progress against the roadmap.

First conversation

Book a free intro call

In 30 minutes we talk through the workload and the pressure around it, and whether a Well-Architected review is the right next step.

You talk to Danny Steenman, the engineer who does the work. Pick a time below and he confirms it by email.

  • Free 30-minute call, no commitment
  • Fixed price before any paid work
  • Temporary read-only access