Available in

Turn a Well-Architected review into a remediation roadmap your team can ship.

We review the workload behind the questionnaire, validate what matters across all six pillars, and deliver a plan with clear priorities, implementation guidance, and room for hands-on follow-through if your team needs it.
Request a WAFRSee Report Preview
5/5 from 16 reviews onGoogle ReviewsGoogle Logo
AWS Well-Architected Tool
eu-west-1
Workloadsproduction-saasReview Dashboard
Pillar Assessment

6 pillars reviewed

4/6 Need Attention
Operational Excellence82%
Security45%
Reliability68%
Performance Efficiency91%
Cost Optimization54%
Sustainability73%
Assessment complete · 47 best practices evaluated
Remediation Items
24 Actions
6
AWS Well-Architected pillars reviewed with architecture context, not just questionnaire answers
1
Prioritized remediation path covering quick wins, phased work, and implementation detail
Why generic reviews stall

Most Well-Architected reviews fail when the findings hit the engineering backlog.

The problem is rarely the framework itself. It is the handoff. Teams get broad recommendations without enough workload context, prioritization, or implementation detail to turn the review into shipped work.

What changes after the review

The outcome is a roadmap your team can sequence into real engineering work instead of another document that needs its own translation step before remediation begins.

Typical review

Framework language and checklist findings that still leave engineering with the harder prioritization and sequencing work.

What your team needs

A review that shows what matters, what it affects, and how to convert the outcome into a safer AWS delivery plan.

Typical review

Depth vs. surface scan

Questionnaire-led reviews that never inspect the actual workload design, resource configuration, or operating constraints behind the answers.

What your team needs

Depth vs. surface scan

A workload review grounded in the architecture itself, with findings traced back to the services and decisions your team already owns.

Typical review

Priorities vs. laundry lists

Long exports of best-practice gaps that make every issue feel equally urgent, even when the business impact is clearly not equal.

What your team needs

Priorities vs. laundry lists

Risk-ranked recommendations that help engineering and stakeholders agree on what must change now, what can wait, and why.

Typical review

Roadmap vs. report dump

A PDF that tells the team where the workload is weak but does not explain how to sequence the work into real delivery windows.

What your team needs

Roadmap vs. report dump

A phased remediation plan with ownership cues, implementation guidance, and enough specificity to move directly into backlog planning.

Report preview

From findings to a concrete improvement plan.

The report is structured to move from visibility to action. Each layer gives the team enough context to decide what to fix first and enough detail to start executing without another discovery cycle.

Why teams act on it

Each report section is designed to reduce decision friction: what matters first, what is real in this workload, and how to sequence the remediation into work engineering can actually ship.

Pillar scorecard
4/6 pillars need attention
Security
45%
Reliability
60%
Cost Optimization
55%
Performance
80%
Operational Excellence
65%
Sustainability
70%

Pillar assessment

The overview
Six-pillar visibility without flattening the workload

The opening layer shows where the architecture is strongest, where the larger gaps sit, and how those findings distribute across the Well-Architected pillars.

Choosing the review model

Not all Well-Architected reviews produce the same kind of engineering outcome.

The AWS tool helps surface questions. Generic consultants can turn that into a report. The gap is what happens next: prioritization, architecture context, and implementation detail.

Certified AWS architecture depth

The review is grounded in production AWS delivery work, so the recommendations are shaped by real operating constraints instead of generic framework language.

All six pillars, reviewed together

Security, reliability, performance, cost, operational excellence, and sustainability are assessed as one workload system rather than six disconnected checklists.

Action-ready remediation output

Findings can include CLI commands, console steps, and infrastructure-as-code guidance so the report becomes useful implementation input immediately.

AWS WA Tool

Depth of analysis

Resource-level inspection
None
Architecture context
None

Deliverables

IaC remediation snippets
Not included
CLI commands and console steps
Not included

Actionable outcome

Prioritized roadmap
Not included
Implementation effort required from your team
High

Pillar coverage

All six pillars covered together
Self-assessed

Implementation support

Post-review remediation help
Not included

Generic consultant

Depth of analysis

Resource-level inspection
Limited
Architecture context
Basic

Deliverables

IaC remediation snippets
Not included
CLI commands and console steps
Not included

Actionable outcome

Prioritized roadmap
Basic
Implementation effort required from your team
High

Pillar coverage

All six pillars covered together
Partial

Implementation support

Post-review remediation help
Not included

Towards The Cloud

Depth of analysis

Resource-level inspection
Comprehensive
Architecture context
Expert

Deliverables

IaC remediation snippets
Included
CLI commands and console steps
Included

Actionable outcome

Prioritized roadmap
Included
Implementation effort required from your team
Lower

Pillar coverage

All six pillars covered together
Full

Implementation support

Post-review remediation help
Included
How the review runs

The Well-Architected review roadmap

The engagement is structured to move from workload context to a remediation plan engineering can actually use. The goal is a better next change sequence, not a checklist artifact that stalls after delivery.

Step 1

Discovery and temporary access

We start with the workload context, the pressures behind it, and the current architectural concerns before setting up temporary read-only AWS access.

Scope confirmedAccess setupKnown architecture concerns logged
Step 2

Six-pillar workload analysis

We review the workload across all six Well-Architected pillars, validating findings against the actual resource configuration and design decisions instead of relying on questionnaire answers alone.

Pillar-by-pillar findingsArchitecture-aware notesValidated risk picture
Step 3

Report and remediation roadmap

You receive a report with prioritized recommendations, implementation guidance, and a phased roadmap that helps the team sequence quick wins and larger architecture changes.

WAFR reportRemediation guidancePrioritized roadmapExecutive summary

Remediate with your team

Use the roadmap, console steps, and infrastructure guidance as the implementation plan for internal follow-through.

  • Phased remediation roadmap
  • CLI and console guidance
  • IaC examples where useful
Start with the review

Bring us in for remediation

We can stay involved for the implementation phase, sequence higher-risk changes, and help validate the workload after the remediation lands.

  • Hands-on implementation
  • Change sequencing support
  • Post-remediation validation
Request remediation help

Get the AWS Well-Architected review through AWS Marketplace

Purchase the engagement through AWS Marketplace when procurement or billing needs to stay inside your AWS vendor workflow.

Buy on
Need a narrower first slice first? Start with the Security Review when the immediate pressure is risk reduction instead of broader architecture posture.
Explore the Security Review
Well-Architected review FAQ

Questions teams ask
before granting access

What is included in the Well-Architected Framework Review report?
Our WAFR report provides a comprehensive assessment across all six pillars:
  • Pillar-by-Pillar Findings: Detailed analysis of your workloads against Operational Excellence, Security, Reliability, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability.
  • Risk Prioritization: Findings ranked by business impact and severity so you know exactly where to focus first.
  • Remediation Roadmap: A phased improvement plan with step-by-step instructions, IaC snippets, and AWS Console guidance for each finding.
This structured approach ensures you have a clear understanding of your architectural risks and a concrete plan to address them.
How is this different from the AWS Well-Architected Tool?

The AWS Well-Architected Tool is a self-service questionnaire that relies on your team's own answers. Our review goes deeper: we analyze your actual resource configurations, IAM policies, networking setup, and operational practices. We validate findings against real-world best practices, remove false positives, and deliver prioritized recommendations with implementation guidance your team can act on immediately.

Which Well-Architected Framework pillars do you review?

We review all six pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework: Operational Excellence, Security, Reliability, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability. Each pillar is assessed individually with findings and recommendations specific to your workloads and business context.

How long does the review take?

A typical Well-Architected Framework Review takes 1-2 weeks depending on the size and complexity of your environment. This includes the initial discovery call, the deep-dive analysis across all six pillars, and the delivery of the comprehensive report with a findings walkthrough session.

What happens after the review?

We deliver the report and walk you through the findings in a dedicated session. From there, you choose your path: implement the improvements yourself using our detailed guides and IaC snippets, or engage us to handle the remediation. We also offer follow-up reviews to validate improvements and track progress against the roadmap.

Do you need access to our AWS accounts?

Yes, we require temporary read-only access to perform the review. We provide a CloudFormation template that creates a time-limited IAM role with only the permissions needed for the assessment. All activity is logged in your CloudTrail, and access is removed as soon as the review concludes.

Book the review

Ready to make the next AWS improvement cycle less ambiguous?

We'll talk through the workload, the operational pressure around it, and whether a Well-Architected review is the right starting point before broader remediation work begins.

Temporary read-only accessSix-pillar remediation roadmapOptional implementation support

Need a narrower first pass? Our AWS Security Review focuses on risk reduction only. You can also explore our other AWS Professional Services.